Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7 – Head To Head Comparison

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7

No matter how long you’ve been fishing or what your skill level is, it’s sometimes difficult to find a school of fish.

Instead of getting frustrated or feeling like you’ve wasted the whole day out on the water, when you rely on a great fish finder, you can easily locate the fish you’re looking for without a lot of hassle.

Knowing that you have a powerful fish finder to rely on will give you the confidence that you need to go out in the boat and catch fish, and will allow you to return to the same location again if you desire.

That is why we have decided to compare the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7.

Spec Comparison

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7
VS
Screen Size
7 inches
VS
7 inches
Screen Resolution
800x480
VS
800x480
Wattage
4000 watts
VS
500 watts
Frequency Range
83/200kHz
VS
50/83/200kHz
Warranty
1 year
VS
1 year

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7

Specification Comparison and Reviews

Instead of trying to figure out which is the best fish finder just by reading reviews, comparing three features and then ranking the fish finders from 1-100, makes it really easy to see which one comes out on top and will allow buyers to make an informed decision when they go shopping.

Frequency

You want to make sure that your fish finder is working correctly and will show a lot of detail, so you can easily determine what is below you in the water.

The frequency of your chosen fish finder will let you know at what rate the sound waves are able to pass through the water and then be measured.

Lower frequency is best for deep or saltwater fishing, while higher frequency fish finders are ideal for fresh or shallow-water fishing.

Look for a wide range if you are interested in being able to take your fish finder with you, no matter where you are going to be fishing.

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti

The maximum depth on this fish finder is only 1000 ft, and the frequency is low enough to warrant that limit.

The frequency is 50-200 or 83-200 kHz, as well as 455-800 kHz in deeper water, but this won’t be nearly as powerful, so it’s best used in shallow water.

Simrad GO7

The traditional frequency on this fish finder is 83-200 kHz, but has a down scan, as well as a structure scan of 455-800 kHz, which means that you can see around items in the water easily.

This is strong enough for most fishing needs and will allow you to see your targets in the water.

Winner

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti 55 Points
Simrad Go7 70 Points

The Simrad Go7 is the  winner here, with strong frequencies that are incredibly easy to adjust while you are on the water.

This makes it very simple to control what you are seeing on your screen, and to make changes so that the picture is as clear as possible, which will allow you to tell what the fish are and where they are, so that you can have a great day out in the boat.

While other fish finders offer similar frequencies, the Simrad Go7 is superior and has a reputation for being incredibly powerful.

Pixel Rating and Screen Quality

In general, the more pixels that you have on your screen, the better your view is going to be. You’ll enjoy much clearer images of what is below the water, when you opt for a fish finder that has a higher pixel rating.

Of course, it’s important to remember that the pixel rating also depends on the size of the screen, as larger screens will be able to support more pixels. In addition, the price of the unit will increase as the pixel rating does, so that is something that you have to bear in mind when making your final choice.

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti

At 480 x 800 pixels, this fish finder is directly in line with other models on the market.

The LCD screen is WVGA color TFT, which combines both the power of the WVGA color with the visibility of a TFT display, but you do have to be aware of the possibility of distortion.

Simrad GO7

With 480 x 800 pixel resolution, this may seem like just another average fish finder, but the Simrad GO7 has a strong display that is also touchscreen, making it easy to use.

The pixel rating is high enough to see what’s underneath you without any problems, and the screen is advanced enough to be able to tell what you’re looking at easily.

Winner

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti
Simrad Go7

When considering pixel rating and overall screen quality, both the Simrad Go7 and the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti have the same quality and features.

While the pixel rating is consistent across the board, the type of display matters, and will have a huge bearing in the overall quality of what you are able to see on your screen, and how easily you can find and catch your fish.

The Simrad Go7 has full color touchscreen display without the TFT distortion which is why we gave it the edge.

Wattage

You want your fish finder to be as efficient as can be, so that you can see clearly under the water. The watts used by your finder will determine how deep the transmission can go.

Shallow water will only need lower watts, around 100-watt, but saltwater and deeper water fishing will require a fish finder that has a higher wattage.

This is because you want the transmission to penetrate deep into the water, and saltwater has a higher absorption capacity, so you need a higher wattage to compensate to be able to see clearly.

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti

This fish finder has a 500 watt transmit power, but is able to go up to 4000 watts peak-to-peak, making it a little more powerful than some of the other available options.

Because it doesn’t have as high a frequency as other fish finders, you shouldn’t have any problems with seeing to the right depth, as you won’t be able to look in deep water anyway.

Simrad GO7

The wattage on this fish finder is only 500 watts, which will do the job for you in shallow or fresh water, but isn’t going to be strong enough to help you out when you want to fish in the ocean, or are going to be in particularly deep water.

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti
Simrad Go7

While the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti’s power is more than the Simrad Go7 , it pulls ahead in this category because the fish finder has the ability to have peak power at 4,000 watts compared to 500 watts.

You won’t ever have to worry about how deep you want to fish, what the water is like, or whether or not there is debris floating beneath you, as these fish finders will give you a clear view of everything underneath your boat, without any problems or hassles as it automatically and quickly updates your view.

Final Score

Lowrance Elite 7 Ti = 205 Points

Simrad Go7 = 220 Points

It was a close call between the Simrad Go7 vs the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti.

The Lowrance Elite 7 Ti and the Simrad Go7 are very powerful fish finders designed for people who are serious about their time out on the boat, and want the best possible chance to catch a great fish.

They are the perfect fish finder for both salt or freshwater and are powerful enough to help you navigate deep water and uneven water beds.

While they may not be ideal for commercial fishermen who need units that are a little more powerful and come with additional options, these fish finders are packed with benefits and features that make it easy to find where you’re going, track the fish you want to catch, and stay abreast of what is going on underneath you in the water.

No matter if you are an amateur or have been fishing your whole life, you’ll love using either the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti or the Simrad Go7.

Positives
  • CHIRP 2D Sonar
  • GPS
  • Easy To Use Touchscreen Navigation
  • TrackBack (sonar recording)

Negatives
  • Touchscreen Needs Clean Hands
  • Uninformative Manual

Positives
  • Multi-Touch Display
  • Chartplotter
  • 7″ Screen
  • CHIRP and Structure Scan

Negatives
  • Touchscreen Will Need Clean Hands
  • Limited Range

Our Choice

It was a tough choice deciding between the Lowrance Elite 7 Ti and the Simrad Go7.

The Lowrance Elite 7 Ti and Simrad Go7 both have their pros and cons however when you compare price, then the choice becomes a little clearer.

We chose the Simrad Go7 as our recommended fish finder in our Lowrance Elite 7 Ti VS Simrad Go7  – head to head comparison.

Duke Taber is the owner of 3 successful websites and is now taking his skill as a webmaster and using it to help non-profit organizations and leaders around the world.